FLK1 · Multiple-choice practice
FLK1 Contract Law — Question 30
Try this question in the test bank →Question
Alice, a small business owner, enters into a contract with Bob to purchase inventory for her shop. Bob realizes that Alice is in urgent need of the inventory to fulfil existing client orders and threatens to withhold the delivery of the inventory unless Alice agrees to pay a significantly higher price than originally negotiated. Feeling pressured and fearing the consequences of not receiving the inventory on time, Alice reluctantly agrees to Bob’s demands and signs the contract. Can Alice subsequently rescind the contract with Bob?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Yes, Alice can rescind the contract with Bob on the grounds of economic duress since a threat to breach a contract is considered illegitimate.
In this scenario, Bob’s conduct of exploiting Alice’s urgent need for the inventory to demand a significantly higher price constitutes economic duress. Economic duress occurs when one party to a contract will use an illegitimate threat to obtain an unfair advantage, and the other party feels compelled to agree. Bob’s threat to withhold the delivery of the inventory unless Alice agrees to pay a higher price exploits Alice’s vulnerable position and deprives her of meaningful choice in the transaction. While a threat to breach a contract is not illegal (in the criminal sense), it will be considered illegitimate. Therefore, Alice can rescind the contract with Bob on the grounds of economic duress.
Original newsletter explanation ↗Continue in the test bank for scoring, feedback, progress tracking and timed mini mocks.
More FLK1 Contract Law questions →