Dr Yannis SQE HubOpen test bank →

FLK1 · Multiple-choice practice

FLK1 Business Law — Question 33

Try this question in the test bank →

Question

Alice and Bob are both directors of a company that manufactures electronic gadgets. Alice proposes a new marketing strategy aimed at targeting a younger demographic, while Bob advocates for maintaining the company’s current marketing approach. During a heated board meeting, the disagreement between Alice and Bob escalates, with each director vehemently defending their position in front of the other directors. Ultimately, the board votes in favour of Alice’s proposal, and the new marketing strategy is implemented. However, Bob is dissatisfied with the decision and believes that Alice manipulated the other directors to secure the outcome in her favour as she has hired a marketing company to implement the new plan, in which she is a major shareholder. Bob thinks that the company should be taking legal action against Alice for breaching her duties as a director. Which of the following principles relevant to the duties of directors would be most suitable as a ground of challenge in this scenario?

  1. The duty to stay within conferred powers
  2. The duty to exercise reasonable care and skill
  3. The duty to act in good faith
  4. The duty to avoid conflicts of interest
  5. The duty to promote the success of the company

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: D. The duty to avoid conflicts of interest

The duties of directors in a company include the duty to avoid conflicts of interest. Directors must act in the best interests of the company and avoid situations where their personal interests conflict with those of the company. In this scenario, Alice and Bob, as directors, are obligated to prioritize the company’s interests above their own and to act impartially in making decisions for the benefit of the company. If Bob believes that Alice manipulated the board to advance an agenda, because of a personal business relationship, he may argue that Alice breached her duty to avoid conflicts of interest by prioritizing her personal interests over those of the company. Therefore, the company may have grounds to challenge Alice’s actions if it can be demonstrated that she failed to fulfil her duty to avoid conflicts of interest in relation to this decision and any subsequent transaction with the marketing company.

Original newsletter explanation ↗

Continue in the test bank for scoring, feedback, progress tracking and timed mini mocks.

More FLK1 Business Law questions →